As the title suggests, if the engine can produce the extra torque and BHP, why don't VW issue it with the increased BHP from the start?
People on here claim better MPG too (which may mean less emissions)
What I mean is, are there reliability or longevity issues if you have the Roc re-mapped?
Geoff Hibbert
Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:08 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
- In: Deep Black
- With a: DSG box
- Location: Loughborough, Leics
- Contact:
- CTRnutter
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:08 am
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
- In: Reflex Silver
- With a: DSG box
- Location: Chigwell, Essex
Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place
Insurance! That would be my first guess, thats why they underquote the the acceleration figures too, 0-60 takes 7.2 secs according to VW which is actually comical



Car is now Sold!!!!! BMW 7 Series for now as nice and big but holding out for something a little special as my toy 

- Sam Greir
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:25 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
- In: Viper Green
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Guildford
Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place
What do you think a more likely figure is for a standard 2.0TSI? The only reason i ask is because i seem spank my mate in his new 3.25 coupe, i think figures are 0-60 6.6. His excuse is he's still running it inCTRnutter wrote:Insurance! That would be my first guess, thats why they underquote the the acceleration figures too, 0-60 takes 7.2 secs according to VW which is actually comical![]()

- CTRnutter
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:08 am
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
- In: Reflex Silver
- With a: DSG box
- Location: Chigwell, Essex
Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place
VW driver quote 5.6 which I think is pretty hard to achieve real world but 6 secs I'd say is achievable I managed a 14.2 1/4 mile at santa pod when the car was completely standard so I'd say a 6 sec 0-60 would be about rightSam Greir wrote:What do you think a more likely figure is for a standard 2.0TSI? The only reason i ask is because i seem spank my mate in his new 3.25 coupe, i think figures are 0-60 6.6. His excuse is he's still running it inCTRnutter wrote:Insurance! That would be my first guess, thats why they underquote the the acceleration figures too, 0-60 takes 7.2 secs according to VW which is actually comical![]()

Car is now Sold!!!!! BMW 7 Series for now as nice and big but holding out for something a little special as my toy 

-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:08 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
- In: Deep Black
- With a: DSG box
- Location: Loughborough, Leics
- Contact:
Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place
If that's the case, what's the 0-60 like on a Bluefin re-mapped 2.0 Roc???
Still no answers to my question though.
The reason I ask I that I have got to keep mine for three years and am worried that if I re-map I may suffer engine fatigue?? I may of course be barking up the wrong tree!!
Still no answers to my question though.
The reason I ask I that I have got to keep mine for three years and am worried that if I re-map I may suffer engine fatigue?? I may of course be barking up the wrong tree!!
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:23 am
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
- In: Deep Black
- With a: Manual box
- Location: South Wales
Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place
Sam, your 'Roc will take on and beat a 325i Coupe no probs (Run in or Non run in lol) The original Scirocco review in Top Gear magazine had a BMW 125i coupe (same engine as in the 3 series, 3 litre non turbo) and a Golf GTi and the 'Roc thrashed both around a track. There is also video footage (on here or SciroccoNet) of a similar test in the wet. Again the Beemer didnt stand a chance. Bet you are glad you got the 'Roc now 

No Scirocco now - Just a black '57 Plate Black Jetta!
- jmn82
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 2:17 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
- In: Rising Blue
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Cambridge
Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place
Part of it comes down to the fact that they makes the engines so that they are able to run on the worst possible grade of fuel you can imagine. There is no guarantee that the fuel quality is going to be the same wherever you go, and in some countries it will be significantly poorer than in others. The fuel quality in the UK and in Europe in general is pretty high, so they then engines can be tuned to make the most of this.Geoff Hibbert wrote:If that's the case, what's the 0-60 like on a Bluefin re-mapped 2.0 Roc???
Still no answers to my question though.
The reason I ask I that I have got to keep mine for three years and am worried that if I re-map I may suffer engine fatigue?? I may of course be barking up the wrong tree!!
As long as you're not planning a road trip to rural Kazakhstan any time soon, then you're unlikley to run into problems

As CTR mentioned, power is another consideration. I don't know how it calculated in reality, but if they'd made the Roc with 250bhp as standard, then it probably would have put it straight into insurance group 19 or 20 which could potentially have harmed sales.
There definitely is the possibility of greater wear and tear in the engine with a remap, due to the increased stresses as you mention. That's where you put your faith in the tuner and hope they adjustments they've made are balanced and sensible

I've been Revo'd
Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place
video's been on here ages in reviews section
vw have to make cars to work in all sort of climates and fuel quality is also an issue, they also put in tolerances on their components, mapping is nothing new, some companies also give warranties if damaged as a result of the map, read the small print, i change mine every couple of years so not really bothered

vw have to make cars to work in all sort of climates and fuel quality is also an issue, they also put in tolerances on their components, mapping is nothing new, some companies also give warranties if damaged as a result of the map, read the small print, i change mine every couple of years so not really bothered
Golf 7R - Golf 7R - BMW M2
- Sam Greir
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:25 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
- In: Viper Green
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Guildford
Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place
BlackRoc wrote:Sam, your 'Roc will take on and beat a 325i Coupe no probs (Run in or Non run in lol) The original Scirocco review in Top Gear magazine had a BMW 125i coupe (same engine as in the 3 series, 3 litre non turbo) and a Golf GTi and the 'Roc thrashed both around a track. There is also video footage (on here or SciroccoNet) of a similar test in the wet. Again the Beemer didnt stand a chance. Bet you are glad you got the 'Roc now

