Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place

Technical discussion such as Bluetooth, Sat-Nav, iPods, tyres, brakes, all that kind of stuff.
Post Reply
Geoff Hibbert
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:08 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Deep Black
With a: DSG box
Options: Sat Nav, 18" Charleston Wheels, 15mm Eibach Spacers, Cruise, couple of doors, a few tyres, hammerite calipers (chavtatsic) exhaust pipe things too and a silvery GT badge.
Location: Loughborough, Leics
Contact:

Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place

Post by Geoff Hibbert »

As the title suggests, if the engine can produce the extra torque and BHP, why don't VW issue it with the increased BHP from the start?

People on here claim better MPG too (which may mean less emissions)

What I mean is, are there reliability or longevity issues if you have the Roc re-mapped?

Geoff Hibbert
User avatar
CTRnutter
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:08 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Reflex Silver
With a: DSG box
Options: Winter Pack, Leather, Alu Pedals, GT Steering Wheel Badge, Side Sills, Superchips Re-Map, Milltek Non-Res, K&N Induction Kit
Location: Chigwell, Essex

Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place

Post by CTRnutter »

Insurance! That would be my first guess, thats why they underquote the the acceleration figures too, 0-60 takes 7.2 secs according to VW which is actually comical :shake: :D
Car is now Sold!!!!! BMW 7 Series for now as nice and big but holding out for something a little special as my toy :)
User avatar
Sam Greir
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:25 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Viper Green
With a: Manual box
Options: DAB stereo, Viper Green!
Location: Guildford

Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place

Post by Sam Greir »

CTRnutter wrote:Insurance! That would be my first guess, thats why they underquote the the acceleration figures too, 0-60 takes 7.2 secs according to VW which is actually comical :shake: :D
What do you think a more likely figure is for a standard 2.0TSI? The only reason i ask is because i seem spank my mate in his new 3.25 coupe, i think figures are 0-60 6.6. His excuse is he's still running it in
:)
User avatar
CTRnutter
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:08 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Reflex Silver
With a: DSG box
Options: Winter Pack, Leather, Alu Pedals, GT Steering Wheel Badge, Side Sills, Superchips Re-Map, Milltek Non-Res, K&N Induction Kit
Location: Chigwell, Essex

Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place

Post by CTRnutter »

Sam Greir wrote:
CTRnutter wrote:Insurance! That would be my first guess, thats why they underquote the the acceleration figures too, 0-60 takes 7.2 secs according to VW which is actually comical :shake: :D
What do you think a more likely figure is for a standard 2.0TSI? The only reason i ask is because i seem spank my mate in his new 3.25 coupe, i think figures are 0-60 6.6. His excuse is he's still running it in
:)
VW driver quote 5.6 which I think is pretty hard to achieve real world but 6 secs I'd say is achievable I managed a 14.2 1/4 mile at santa pod when the car was completely standard so I'd say a 6 sec 0-60 would be about right :)
Car is now Sold!!!!! BMW 7 Series for now as nice and big but holding out for something a little special as my toy :)
Geoff Hibbert
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:08 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Deep Black
With a: DSG box
Options: Sat Nav, 18" Charleston Wheels, 15mm Eibach Spacers, Cruise, couple of doors, a few tyres, hammerite calipers (chavtatsic) exhaust pipe things too and a silvery GT badge.
Location: Loughborough, Leics
Contact:

Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place

Post by Geoff Hibbert »

If that's the case, what's the 0-60 like on a Bluefin re-mapped 2.0 Roc???

Still no answers to my question though.

The reason I ask I that I have got to keep mine for three years and am worried that if I re-map I may suffer engine fatigue?? I may of course be barking up the wrong tree!!
BlackRoc
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:23 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Deep Black
With a: Manual box
Options: Leather
Sat Nav
Winter Pack
Parking Sensors
Premium Mats (got them free..)
GT Steering wheel badge
Location: South Wales

Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place

Post by BlackRoc »

Sam, your 'Roc will take on and beat a 325i Coupe no probs (Run in or Non run in lol) The original Scirocco review in Top Gear magazine had a BMW 125i coupe (same engine as in the 3 series, 3 litre non turbo) and a Golf GTi and the 'Roc thrashed both around a track. There is also video footage (on here or SciroccoNet) of a similar test in the wet. Again the Beemer didnt stand a chance. Bet you are glad you got the 'Roc now :clap:
No Scirocco now - Just a black '57 Plate Black Jetta!
User avatar
jmn82
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 2:17 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Cruise Control, Dynaudio soundpack, Anthracite Vienna Leather, Rear Parking Sensors, Premium Mats and Sills
Location: Cambridge

Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place

Post by jmn82 »

Geoff Hibbert wrote:If that's the case, what's the 0-60 like on a Bluefin re-mapped 2.0 Roc???

Still no answers to my question though.

The reason I ask I that I have got to keep mine for three years and am worried that if I re-map I may suffer engine fatigue?? I may of course be barking up the wrong tree!!
Part of it comes down to the fact that they makes the engines so that they are able to run on the worst possible grade of fuel you can imagine. There is no guarantee that the fuel quality is going to be the same wherever you go, and in some countries it will be significantly poorer than in others. The fuel quality in the UK and in Europe in general is pretty high, so they then engines can be tuned to make the most of this.

As long as you're not planning a road trip to rural Kazakhstan any time soon, then you're unlikley to run into problems :)

As CTR mentioned, power is another consideration. I don't know how it calculated in reality, but if they'd made the Roc with 250bhp as standard, then it probably would have put it straight into insurance group 19 or 20 which could potentially have harmed sales.

There definitely is the possibility of greater wear and tear in the engine with a remap, due to the increased stresses as you mention. That's where you put your faith in the tuner and hope they adjustments they've made are balanced and sensible :) From personal experience I'd say that the part that is most likely to fail early is the turbo. That's why upgrading from the K03 to K04 turbo is a popular move if you're going for much more power.
I've been Revo'd
wigit
Posts: 6560
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:46 pm
Options: I used to own one
Location: Northamptonshire

Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place

Post by wigit »

video's been on here ages in reviews section :yes:

vw have to make cars to work in all sort of climates and fuel quality is also an issue, they also put in tolerances on their components, mapping is nothing new, some companies also give warranties if damaged as a result of the map, read the small print, i change mine every couple of years so not really bothered
Golf 7R - Golf 7R - BMW M2
User avatar
Sam Greir
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:25 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Viper Green
With a: Manual box
Options: DAB stereo, Viper Green!
Location: Guildford

Re: Re-Maps - Why don't VW give the extra BHP in the first place

Post by Sam Greir »

BlackRoc wrote:Sam, your 'Roc will take on and beat a 325i Coupe no probs (Run in or Non run in lol) The original Scirocco review in Top Gear magazine had a BMW 125i coupe (same engine as in the 3 series, 3 litre non turbo) and a Golf GTi and the 'Roc thrashed both around a track. There is also video footage (on here or SciroccoNet) of a similar test in the wet. Again the Beemer didnt stand a chance. Bet you are glad you got the 'Roc now :clap:
:D Excellent, will find that clip and show my mate! :clap:
Post Reply