95 or 98 Ron

Technical discussion such as Bluetooth, Sat-Nav, iPods, tyres, brakes, all that kind of stuff.
Post Reply
User avatar
iroc
Posts: 445
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:33 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Deep Black
With a: DSG box
Options: Black Leather, Pano Roof, Winter Pack, Mats, Sat Nav, Prem Sills.
Now Sold
Location: Manchester

95 or 98 Ron

Post by iroc »

Ok, looking for some advice. I am new to the VW brand and was wondering what you knowledgable people would recommend. Would it be 95 ron or 98 ron. And what are the plus and minus points.
I used 95 ron in my E46 M3 and had no problems.
User avatar
langlord
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: London

Re: 95 or 98 Ron

Post by langlord »

I think one of tha major magazines carried out a test on the different petrols and basically found no performance improvements they did say that it may make a very minor difference to maintaning the car but you would not see the cost recovery
Candy white scirocco, black leather, dyno audio, mats, auto glym protection - build week 39
User avatar
Kev
Administrator
Posts: 5073
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:25 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: DSG box
Options: Leather, cruise, parking sensors, folding mirrors, flat tyre indicator
Sadly replaced now by an F-Type.
Location: Oxford

Re: 95 or 98 Ron

Post by Kev »

Do you mean this article by Which? magazine

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/arti ... nment.html
martdy
Posts: 462
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:30 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: DSG box
Options: Vienna Leather,Winter Pack,Dynaudio with DAB,PanoRoof,Parking Sensors,Tyre Indicator,Non Smoking Smokers Pack,Cruise control,Folding Mirrors, Prem Mats/Sills,Gt Badge/Metal Pedals,Fiscon Bluetooth.
Location: Swansea

Re: 95 or 98 Ron

Post by martdy »

Hi Iroc , the TFSi (now Tsi) engines are designed to run on 98+ ron.They actually give better mpg aswell as performance. Although they will run on 95 it is less efficient so penny for penny stick with the Super . The article in the Mail was really about differences in performance between brands and not engine specific.
I've always run my MK5 Gti on Vpower (except when not available) and intend to do the same with my new ROC.
There is a lot of info out there in the Gti forums - have a look

http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=92388.0
Rising Blue,DSG,Vienna Leather,Winter Pack,Pano roof,Folding mirrors,Dynaudio/DAB,Park Sensors,Cruise, Flat tyre indicator,Prem Mats+Sills,Metal Pedals,Gt Badge,Fiscon,Covered cup holder/rear cup holders.Now gone Piano Black with new Climate Control
User avatar
morrissey
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:23 pm
In: Deep Black
With a: Manual box
Options: Golf R, 3 door, manual, leather, sunroof, 19" alloys, ACC, cruise, comfort and storage packs
Location: Warks

Re: 95 or 98 Ron

Post by morrissey »

Interesting - I've always used Optimax / VPower in my A4 which has the same engine as the roc, but there is a subtle difference in the spec here:

My Audi states 95 - 98 RON (For best results on consumption/performance, etc. use 98 RON)
The Scirocco tech guide states only Minimum 95 RON is needed - some changes to the ECU perhaps or some other minor change ?
User avatar
iroc
Posts: 445
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:33 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Deep Black
With a: DSG box
Options: Black Leather, Pano Roof, Winter Pack, Mats, Sat Nav, Prem Sills.
Now Sold
Location: Manchester

Re: 95 or 98 Ron

Post by iroc »

Taken from manual

Image
DavidH
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:06 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Vienna Leather, Xenons, Dynaudio, Factory Bluetooth and Mats

Re: 95 or 98 Ron

Post by DavidH »

I'm sure you can run it on 95 without problems,ECUs are adaptivre nowadays and will compensate presumably.I always run my cars on 98 though.

I've seen a different article a while ago that showed faily significant power differences between fuels,particularly on turbo cars.
Post Reply