Talk about general things related to the new VW Scirocco in here.
Komar
Posts: 215 Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:19 pm
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 122/125
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box
Post
by Komar » Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:15 pm
soooo?
easy queston
or the wheel arches should be smaller?
wigit
Posts: 6560 Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:46 pm
Options: I used to own one
Location: Northamptonshire
Post
by wigit » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:41 pm
Both
Golf 7R - Golf 7R - BMW M2
mike-p
Posts: 473 Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: Suffolk
Contact:
Post
by mike-p » Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:36 am
Ditto
Life's too short to go slow
Skoda Yeti 4x4 Elegance 2.0CR
Revo, Steinbauer & Oscarli Dealer for Suffolk and N.Essex
sparki
Posts: 371 Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:02 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 140/150
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box
Options: Leather and Lows...
Post
by sparki » Sun Sep 04, 2011 1:08 pm
Definately lowered! Just picked mine up on the 2nd and thats the first thing my dad said when I popped round to show him.
Stilts as standard!
langley182
Posts: 141 Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:43 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Candy White
With a: DSG box
Post
by langley182 » Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:39 pm
Yes. At least 70mm
Ryy
Posts: 1098 Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:21 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Viper Green
With a: Manual box
Options: Sat Nav, Heated Leather Seats, Dynaudio, Kit with 19" alloys, 30mm Front / 20mm Rear Lowering Springs, Folding Mirrors, Interior Mats, REVO Stage 1, Carbon wrapped bits and bobs.
Location: England
Post
by Ryy » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:56 pm
dbeholder
Posts: 5 Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:53 am
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Deep Black
With a: Manual box
Options: Sport pack + premium bluetooth
Post
by dbeholder » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:04 am
Both, absolutely. It seems to look much better with 19" or even 20" wheels, AND lowered a bit.
samdub
Posts: 62 Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:06 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Two-tone Cornsilk Beige/Black Vienna Leather, BiXenon Headlights, Cruise Control, DAB Radio, Dynaudio Premium Sound, Interlagos 18's, Parking sensors, Electronic folding mirrors, Mats, Dangley Cherry Air Freshener
Location: Midlands
Post
by samdub » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:32 am
No brainer.
~ GT TDI 208ps revo ~
Kev
Administrator
Posts: 5071 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:25 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: DSG box
Options: Leather, cruise, parking sensors, folding mirrors, flat tyre indicator Sadly replaced now by an F-Type.
Location: Oxford
Post
by Kev » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:42 am
I added a poll.
Yes I think it could easily sit 3-4cm lower with the arches designed to fit that curve better.
I guess they played the compromise game between ride and handling but other VWs in the range seem to sit lower without any problem.
langley182
Posts: 141 Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:43 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Candy White
With a: DSG box
Post
by langley182 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:46 am
They probably wanted it to appeal to EVERYONE. Typical
Turboweasel
Posts: 39 Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:17 pm
I drive a: Scirocco R
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Everything except DSG, Pano roof, Recaro's and leather.
Post
by Turboweasel » Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:58 pm
Kev wrote:
Yes I think it could easily sit 3-4cm lower with the arches designed to fit that curve better.
Snap
wigit
Posts: 6560 Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:46 pm
Options: I used to own one
Location: Northamptonshire
Post
by wigit » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:24 pm
Kev wrote: I added a poll.
Yes I think it could easily sit 3-4cm lower with the arches designed to fit that curve better.
I guess they played the compromise game between ride and handling but other VWs in the range seem to sit lower without any problem.
Lol you said mine looks broken
Golf 7R - Golf 7R - BMW M2
Deacon
Posts: 1729 Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 2:37 pm
Options: Tuned 1.4tsi - gone but not forgotten!
Location: Staffordshire
Post
by Deacon » Thu Sep 22, 2011 8:07 pm
Kev wrote: I added a poll.
Question is will anyone vote no!
playing in my '86
Kev
Administrator
Posts: 5071 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:25 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: DSG box
Options: Leather, cruise, parking sensors, folding mirrors, flat tyre indicator Sadly replaced now by an F-Type.
Location: Oxford
Post
by Kev » Thu Sep 22, 2011 8:25 pm
wigit wrote: Kev wrote: I added a poll.
Yes I think it could easily sit 3-4cm lower with the arches designed to fit that curve better.
I guess they played the compromise game between ride and handling but other VWs in the range seem to sit lower without any problem.
Lol you said mine looks broken
Cos I think you went a little bit toooooo low
It's all to do with the aesthetics of the shape of the wheel and how the wheel arch follows that shape. If you go too far the shapes go out of 'sync' and it looks wrong.
jimma1983
Posts: 86 Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:28 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Indium Grey
With a: Manual box
Options: DAB tuner, Dynaudio Sound Pack, Smoking Pack
Post
by jimma1983 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:50 pm
Deacon wrote: Kev wrote: I added a poll.
Question is will anyone vote no!
I voted no, IMO VW have got it about right.
RoccoScientist
Posts: 181 Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:07 pm
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 122/125
In: Viper Green
With a: Manual box
Post
by RoccoScientist » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:28 am
The ground clearance isn't as high as you'd think by the looks of the stock 'rocco, so I wouldn't lower the car stock car by much. The wheel arches are the real problem. I think the stock 'rocco should be equipped with VW's own lowering springs (by Eibach, ~20 mm lowering), since they make the wheel arch gap to be about the same in each direction. To me the car doesn't even look lowered with those springs, it looks stock - and in my eyes the stock 'rocco now looks like it's got a bad road package.
char
Posts: 113 Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:50 pm
I drive a: Scirocco R
In: Deep Black
With a: DSG box
Post
by char » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:32 pm
I saw a roc that was lowered I thought it made the car look really fat and kind of spoilt its lines :s
KenzoPL
Posts: 25 Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 12:07 pm
With a: DSG box
Post
by KenzoPL » Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:31 pm
RoccoScientist wrote: The ground clearance isn't as high as you'd think by the looks of the stock 'rocco, so I wouldn't lower the car stock car by much. The wheel arches are the real problem. I think the stock 'rocco should be equipped with VW's own lowering springs (by Eibach, ~20 mm lowering), since they make the wheel arch gap to be about the same in each direction. To me the car doesn't even look lowered with those springs, it looks stock - and in my eyes the stock 'rocco now looks like it's got a bad road package.
QFT :-)
robmx
Posts: 276 Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:51 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Pewter Grey
With a: Manual box
Options: Winter Pack, Cruise Control, Parking Sensors.
Post
by robmx » Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:12 am
Should be easy 50mm lower at least out of the box.
I'm jealous of mk6 Golf owners, it's arches make it soooo much easier to lower the car practically.
langley182
Posts: 141 Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:43 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Candy White
With a: DSG box
Post
by langley182 » Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:21 pm
There's no point arguing the low debate.
One mans low is another mans ridiculous.
And one mans ride height is another mans joke.