BMW 320D

Post Reply
avatar157
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:54 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Deep Black
With a: DSG box

BMW 320D

Post by avatar157 »

Strange title I know for a Roc site, but I just had to post after having a go in a mates 320D.

First of all the layout is just so dated, I mean I came from a Alfa Romeo Brera which was like siting in a Milano coffee bar and I got a shock how spartan the Roc looked. But compared with the BMW it looks positively like the bridge of the Enterprise!

The seats are like a velour and even after only 7000 miles they are bagging at the edges and corners. The dash and door have silver plastic inserts made to look like carbon fibre and they look like..well cheap silver painted plastic.

Engine was good but the thing was so sensitive to bumps in the road which makes you keep both hands on the wheel. Getting back in the Roc and big old thump when you close the door and feeling of a solid built motor that feels really planted was welcome.

I often fancied a Beemer but if the 320D is anything to go by then I have definitely got the best car, just wish mine was white and not black the Roc just looks the business is white.
trix
Posts: 5979
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 11:43 am
Options: Gone but never forgotten; Sumatra, Cruise, Parking Sensors, Flat Tyre Indicator, boot liner, hatchbag, premium sills, SciroccoCentral stickers & hedgehog!
Ordered 23rd June 09
Build week 41
Handover 17th Oct 09
Off to his new home July 2016 after nearly 7 years & 88800 miles.

Missing RW1
Location: Norfolk

Re: BMW 320D

Post by trix »

avatar157 wrote:Strange title I know for a Roc site, but I just had to post after having a go in a mates 320D.
thats why we have an off topic section ;)

S
fun meter
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:10 am
I drive a: Scirocco R
In: Deep Black
With a: DSG box
Options: MY12, 19" wheels, Leather, RNS510, Cruise, Bluetooth, Parking Sensors, Folding Mirrors, Premium mats, MDI...
Location: Kent

Re: BMW 320D

Post by fun meter »

Some of the BMW's are not that impressive as you mention.

Recently drove the 2.3i Z4, and much preferred my Roc. Although nice quality and good looking, I didnt like the light steering, dash and gearbox - which are probably 3 key things I look at if Im happy with the look. Roc feels so planted, and faster, in comparison.

Have driven an E92 M3, which is brilliant. Family own latest X5 and E60 M5, both of which are also fantastic. But I think some of the more standard models (1 and 3 series) lack something, especially on the inside.
User avatar
nd10
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 8:04 pm
With a: Manual box
Location: North Shields

Re: BMW 320D

Post by nd10 »

My previous 5 cars have been BMW's including a 325ci and a 2.0l Z4 and I can say without question I do not regret moving to a VW as I knew I wouldn't. The build quality is as good and the drive equally so. Agree with the comment on the Z4, dated interior and a harsh ride.
jc74
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:08 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Pewter Grey
With a: DSG box
Options: Cruise Control, Leather, Sunroof, DVD Satnav, Parking Sensors
Location: London

Re: BMW 320D

Post by jc74 »

I'm surprised you found the seats showing wear after only 7000 miles.
I've had a E90 330i M Sport, and a E90 320i M Sport in my time, and found the build quality better than the Roc, with the leather sport seast more comfortable.
The 330i engine is definitely better than the Roc, but thirsty. The 320i is bit gutless in the low end.
As for ride quality, both definitely harder than the Roc, but they were on runflats, so that is proably why.
However, I found that the Beemers lacked the in-cabin rattles which the Roc seems to have every now and again.
Both beemers were specced with satnav/iDrive and I found that system worked fairly well, definitely easier choosing music tracks than trying to scroll down on the RNS510.

Of course from a value for money point of view (amount of money paid, running costs vs the fun you get out of the car), the Roc definitely wins out!
maisbitt
Posts: 1062
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:42 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Parking Sensors, Smokers Pack (for aesthetics), R gearstick, R pedals, Sliding cup holder cover.

Re: BMW 320D

Post by maisbitt »

I just wish VW would take a few leaves out of BMWs book - they're now getting 185PS/380NM out of their 2.0 Diesel vs 170PS/350NM out of the 2.0TDI. BMW economy is far better with their efficient dynamics too. My boss' new 520D is noticeably more economical than even my 140 TDI Roc and it's pulling a bigger car along. Stick that engine in a Roc with the efficient dynamics technology and you'd have somewhere close to an official 65mpg combined economy and 185PS!

Hate the run flats though - so many BMW drivers hate them too - why won't BMW listen to their customers for that issue?
2013 - Tornado Red MK7 Golf GTD on order
2011-2013 - Rising Blue 170GT
2009-2011 - Pewter Roc 140GT
2007-2009 - Tornado Red Golf 170TDI GT
2005-2007 - Black Pearl Golf 140TDI GT
2003-2005 - Black Pearl Polo 1.9TDI
wigit
Posts: 6560
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:46 pm
Options: I used to own one
Location: Northamptonshire

Re: BMW 320D

Post by wigit »

if i was in the market for a diesel it would have a bmw badge simples
Golf 7R - Golf 7R - BMW M2
yellowplum
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:25 pm
In: Deep Black
With a: Manual box
Options: Truffel Leather, 19" Wheels, DVD Sat Nav, Xenon Lights, Bluetooth Phone, Parking Sensors, Drivers Electric Seat, Electric Fold-able Mirrors, Winter Pack, Hill Hold, Flat Tyre Indicator - added VW Racing Springs, and changed Bluetooth to newer model.

Re: BMW 320D

Post by yellowplum »

maisbitt wrote:I just wish VW would take a few leaves out of BMWs book - they're now getting 185PS/380NM out of their 2.0 Diesel vs 170PS/350NM out of the 2.0TDI. BMW economy is far better with their efficient dynamics too. My boss' new 520D is noticeably more economical than even my 140 TDI Roc and it's pulling a bigger car along. Stick that engine in a Roc with the efficient dynamics technology and you'd have somewhere close to an official 65mpg combined economy and 185PS!

Hate the run flats though - so many BMW drivers hate them too - why won't BMW listen to their customers for that issue?

BMW Never listen to their customers, I know all about that - two years after having a brand new 123d M Sport and telling them repeatedly that I was getting hesitation when accelerating - no one wanted to fix it, ended up in court. Oh well teach them to listen a bit more!
Post Reply