Irony...rpsmith79 wrote:Only because you are fed up cleaning all the soot off the arse endMr OCD wrote:I'm seriously considering petrol next time round![]()
Last MOT emissions said...
'emissions to clean to test' ...

Irony...rpsmith79 wrote:Only because you are fed up cleaning all the soot off the arse endMr OCD wrote:I'm seriously considering petrol next time round![]()
58 plate will likely just have the RCD510 as standard. Bluetooth was a cost option and I don't think DAB was even available then.Lee170 wrote:Would a 58 plate have dab radio as standard or were they introduced later on?
Also how easy is it to retrofit the Bluetooth found in later models in a 58 plate?
And what's it gonna cost me to buy the unit?
It was for me yepLee170 wrote:Would the steering wheel be a deal breaker?
Is it that much better?
I have an average of 54 real mpg with this car, thats a whole difference with 32/40.rpsmith79 wrote:Depends if you prefer the sound and smell of petrol or diesel
Having owned only one diesel car in my life (MK2 Golf GTTDi) i certainly don't want to own another
I also do a similar commute to your (12 miles, 5 days a week) and i used to be able to get around 250 miles out of £40 worth of diesel around 3 years ago, i can now get 230 miles out of the same amount of petrol in my 2.0 TSi Rocco (works out around 32 mpg), and on a recent trip from Sheffield to Northumberland, i averaged over 40mpg
Yup, big difference. I did a 80 mile run to Yorkshire yesterday with cruise control set at 75mph ... averaged 58mpg.Roy_01 wrote:I have an average of 54 real mpg with this car, thats a whole difference with 32/40.rpsmith79 wrote:Depends if you prefer the sound and smell of petrol or diesel
Having owned only one diesel car in my life (MK2 Golf GTTDi) i certainly don't want to own another
I also do a similar commute to your (12 miles, 5 days a week) and i used to be able to get around 250 miles out of £40 worth of diesel around 3 years ago, i can now get 230 miles out of the same amount of petrol in my 2.0 TSi Rocco (works out around 32 mpg), and on a recent trip from Sheffield to Northumberland, i averaged over 40mpg
But on that short drives i wouldn't bother too.
Salsa red is nice ... a friend has one.Lee170 wrote:The blue 58 plate sold, I was umming and arring and lost out. Found an 09 in my price range but still got the older dash, it's red, what are people's thoughts on a red Rocco?
Look good still?
My current car needs 4 new tyres and the mot runs out Jan 17, Hence the rush to trade it in
I don't think it is most at all TBH... you only hear about the bad ones.Lee170 wrote:Did most pre 2012 petrol models suffer with the rattle that trashes the engine?
Just starting to worry now about buying a petrol Rocco as I don't want to get a bill for thousands down the line
Is the revision retro fittable to a pre 2012/23 engine?
If so then what does it cost?
Still waiting to find out when the new engine was fitted on this red Rocco I'm thinking of buying
All petrol except the R, which along with the diesels is belt driven.Lee170 wrote:Ok thanks,
Is it only on the petrol models?
It's a major job getting access to chain and tensioners on a chain driven engine from memory.rpsmith79 wrote:But on the diesels you have to get the belt changed at certain intervals anyway, so if you just look at the timing chain tensioner the same as that, then it's no different to any other car/engine you might buy
I suspect the price will be about the same either way, from what i have read it's about a £35 tensioner and 3-4 hours labour, so at £70 an hour plus parts, thats around £315 (at 4 hours) for the tensioner, i have never had a cam belt replaced for less than £250 on my previous few cars, so not much of a difference reallyMr OCD wrote:It's a major job getting access to chain and tensioners on a chain driven engine from memory.rpsmith79 wrote:But on the diesels you have to get the belt changed at certain intervals anyway, so if you just look at the timing chain tensioner the same as that, then it's no different to any other car/engine you might buy
Cambelts, however are simple and easy to replace relatively cheaply.
and once the tensioner *is* replaced, you should be sortedrpsmith79 wrote:I suspect the price will be about the same either way, from what i have read it's about a £35 tensioner and 3-4 hours labour, so at £70 an hour plus parts, thats around £315 (at 4 hours) for the tensioner, i have never had a cam belt replaced for less than £250 on my previous few cars, so not much of a difference reallyMr OCD wrote:It's a major job getting access to chain and tensioners on a chain driven engine from memory.rpsmith79 wrote:But on the diesels you have to get the belt changed at certain intervals anyway, so if you just look at the timing chain tensioner the same as that, then it's no different to any other car/engine you might buy
Cambelts, however are simple and easy to replace relatively cheaply.
I suspect it will have had a reconditioned engine fitted rather than a new engine, but i suppose it depends who did the work, it it was done by VW then there is a very good chance they will have fitted the newer spec parts, but if it was done by an independent garage it could have either in, unless it was stated on the recieptLee170 wrote:Looking at a 09 2.0tsi which they say has had a new engine in 2014, mileage is 61k, so is this the mileage from the original and new engine together so is correct?
I take it the engine had been replaced due to the tensioner issue that these have?
So it should have the new tensioner on and should be trouble free in that area anyway.
Is this still worth buying in your opinion?