shampoo with wax

Info about the best cleaning products and detailing.
Post Reply
skyblues11
Posts: 519
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:49 pm
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Candy White
With a: DSG box
Options: cruise control, front foglight, Multi.f.steering wheel,
tyre indicator

shampoo with wax

Post by skyblues11 »

having taken up detailing as a semi-hobby ( ok, i have too much time on my hand lol!), i have learnt that in principle, wax should be applied on top of paint sealant, not vice versa.

as i have a white Roc, so i use sealant instead of carnauba wax. in fact, i don;t use any wax at all.

but today i came to realised that the shampoo i am using to wash the car ( autoglym shampoo conditioner) does contain wax to help the water sheet off the surface.

does this mean i am doing wrong and the sealant won;t adhere to the panel?

and if i was wrong, does a PH neutral, wax free shampoo exists?

and furthermore, are there any cold water friendly shampoos? it seems impossible to produce a good amount of sud with water at tap standard temperature.

i think i am getting carried away!
MarRocco
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:50 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box
Options: Factory fitted: Parking sensors, Folding mirrors, Winter pack, DAB, Smoking pack, Flat tyre indicator, Mats
Home fitted: Metal pedals and footrest, Covered cup holder, hkb door sills, Razos, Door warning lights

Re: shampoo with wax

Post by MarRocco »

Hi skyblues

I have a white Roc and use Jeffs Werkstat products: Auto Body Wash (suds at tap temperature); Prime Acrylic (pre-sealant prep); Acrylic Jett Trigger (sealant); Acrylic Glos (quick detail). The last three come in the Werkstat Acrylic Kit - it's not cheap but the products are easy to use and look great.
GT 2.0 TSI, Candy, Parking sensors, Folding mirrors, Winter pack, DAB, Smoking pack, Flat tyre indicator, Mats, Metal pedals and footrest, Covered cup holder, Razos, hkb door sills, Door warning lights, VAG-COM
skyblues11
Posts: 519
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:49 pm
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Candy White
With a: DSG box
Options: cruise control, front foglight, Multi.f.steering wheel,
tyre indicator

Re: shampoo with wax

Post by skyblues11 »

Hi MarRocco,

They are a good kit and left the surface shining like a lake.

but i still have half the container of the AG shampoo, so worried about the wax in it.

i am also experimenting with ther Nanolex product and put some on the roof and bonnet. to b honest its hard to judge the 2. Thw werkstatt is a tad shinier i guess, while the Nanolex is claimed to be more chemically superior.

I am just not pro. enough to tell the difference.
autoperfection
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:25 am

Re: shampoo with wax

Post by autoperfection »

Hi Skyblues11

First of all, you're not getting any suds, because of the shampoo you're using... body work shampoo isn't the most sudsy shampoo by a long shot. If you're looking for a pH neutral, wax free shampoo that makes lots of bubbles, we've got two recommendations that would be excellent choices - Duragloss 901 Cherry Wash and Lusso Auto Bathe
http://www.autoperfection.com/shop/Dura ... trate.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.autoperfection.com/shop/Luss ... 237ml.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

If you're happy with the shampoo you're using, then you're fine to continue using it, as it won't have any affect on how the sealant performs, however, if you're looking for something more bubbly, we'd suggest going with either of the above.

Secondly, you can happily apply a carnauba wax followed by a sealant, or a sealant followed by a carnauba wax and both of these combinations will work well. Essentially both products do the same job and neither one of them will cancel each other out. The difference between the two is basically that a carnauba wax is made from mostly natural ingredients and will give a deeper, wetter look, whereas a sealant is mostly man-made and will give longer lasting protection.

I hope that helps and hope it makes sense! :)

All the best

Taryn and Jim
Image
skyblues11
Posts: 519
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:49 pm
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Candy White
With a: DSG box
Options: cruise control, front foglight, Multi.f.steering wheel,
tyre indicator

Re: shampoo with wax

Post by skyblues11 »

thanks Taryn and Jim,

never realised there are so many issues with a simple car shampoo. Anyway, how does Poorboys - Super Slick performs against the duragloss?
motimon
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 9:14 am
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box

Re: shampoo with wax

Post by motimon »

could someone tell me the difference between sealant and wax?

e.g in autoglym, would the super resin polish be the wax and the gloss protecion be the sealant?
trix
Posts: 5979
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 11:43 am
Options: Gone but never forgotten; Sumatra, Cruise, Parking Sensors, Flat Tyre Indicator, boot liner, hatchbag, premium sills, SciroccoCentral stickers & hedgehog!
Ordered 23rd June 09
Build week 41
Handover 17th Oct 09
Off to his new home July 2016 after nearly 7 years & 88800 miles.

Missing RW1
Location: Norfolk

Re: shampoo with wax

Post by trix »

autoperfection 2 posts above you wrote:Essentially both products do the same job and neither one of them will cancel each other out. The difference between the two is basically that a carnauba wax is made from mostly natural ingredients and will give a deeper, wetter look, whereas a sealant is mostly man-made and will give longer lasting protection.
;)
skyblues11
Posts: 519
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:49 pm
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Candy White
With a: DSG box
Options: cruise control, front foglight, Multi.f.steering wheel,
tyre indicator

Re: shampoo with wax

Post by skyblues11 »

hi motimon,

from my research, sealant is better for white and carnauba is better for dark colors. Remember i am no expert so this is just my result from the internet.

then you get those expensive nanotech sealnts that comes in a small bottle.

eitherway, i prefer the spray-on, wipe off types. I can apply more times but shorter time spent on each occasion.
autoperfection
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:25 am

Re: shampoo with wax

Post by autoperfection »

skyblues11 wrote:thanks Taryn and Jim,

never realised there are so many issues with a simple car shampoo. Anyway, how does Poorboys - Super Slick performs against the duragloss?
Hi Skyblues,

Sorry for the delayed response - had issues with our laptops... long story, won't bore you, but we're back up and running with shiny new computers! :D

Asking us to compare the Cherry Wash and Super Slick and Suds is a bit of a tough call really as they're both great products and both have great selling points.

They both have good dilution ratios so are good value for money, although, if you work it out I think the Duragloss is slightly better value for money as it works out cheaper.

They both smell great, which is very important to me! Cherry Wash as you would imagine smells of cherrys! :D Super Slick and Suds smells of Pina Colada's (that's what we've figured anyway... we can't quite put our finger on what it is but boy does it smell good! :D )

They both produce lots of bubbles and have great cleaning power. Both leave an excellent finish but if we had to pick out one over the other, we would probably go for the Poorboys, simlpy because we've found it to be ever so slightly more lubricious than the Duragloss but as we've already said, there really isn't a lot in it!

Hope this helps

Taryn and Jim :)
Image
Post Reply