ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Talk about general things related to the new VW Scirocco in here.
Post Reply
User avatar
RisingRoc
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:32 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 140/150
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: 2 Zone Air Con, Alloy pedals, Luxury Mats, Chrome Exhaust Tips, Rear Cup Holder, HKB Door Sills, Full LED pack
Location: Glasgow

ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by RisingRoc »

Bear with me here as this is all somewhat counter-intuitive, but I have a theory that 'Sport' may be the most fuel efficient ACC selection.

I had a habit of getting into my car on a Friday night after work, switching it from Comfort to Sport and having some fun on my end of week drive home instead of my general midweek cruise. I started to notice that I was usually getting better MPG than throughout the week for the exact same route. I at first put this down to slightly less traffic holding me up and therefore less stationary time and wasted fuel - but then I came up with another theory which might explain it.

It's generally understood that soft tyres waste fuel as it takes more energy to rotate the wheel. Extending that idea, does softer suspension also then lower MPG due to energy going into compression of the suspension?

I have tried using Sport midweek now and generally see better figures too. I know there are a whole lot of other factors that will affect MPG (traffic, gear selection, ambient and engine temperature, time since service etc) but assuming all is equal, am I completely mental in my suspension thinking here?!
Cuprabob
Posts: 5027
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:31 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Panoramic Roof, 19" Black Luganos, Vienna Leather, Parking Sensors, DAB, Dynaudio, Bluetooth, Cruise, Folding Mirrors, Xenons
Location: S/W Scotland

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by Cuprabob »

I can't see it myself
abc121710
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 5:30 pm
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Bi-Xenon Headlights
Adaptive Chassis Control
Tyre Pressure Monitor
Cruise Control
Multi-Function Colour Display

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by abc121710 »

i can see what you mean, its like with bikes, i have a road bike and a mountain bike that has rear suspension and its quite soft, its easier to ride the road bike because on the mountain bike the suspension takes some of the force out of the pedalling and makes it harder. but i think it would be difficult to apply that theory to cars, a bit more complicated :)
ScottC25
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:59 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 140/150
In: Flash Red
With a: Manual box
Options: Lisbon Alloys

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by ScottC25 »

I can see some merit in that, however in sport mode, would it not be harder on the tyres as the suspension is stiffened up?
abc121710
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 5:30 pm
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Bi-Xenon Headlights
Adaptive Chassis Control
Tyre Pressure Monitor
Cruise Control
Multi-Function Colour Display

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by abc121710 »

doesnt the acc stiffen up the steering in sport, does it do it by reducing the electrical assistance or using the electrics to firm it up, if it reduces the electrical assistance this may have a small factor in fuel consumption perhaps???
Macman
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:11 am
I drive a: Scirocco R
In: Rising Blue
With a: DSG box

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by Macman »

It goes towards the way that TSI engines generally prefer higher revs and the old saying from driving school that a car is to be accelerating or breaking and not coasting as the engine would be asking for power to be on/off and not efficient. Also why chip tuning makes it faster yet more efficient. I want this button on the steering wheel!
Can they get GEET to get as much power as petrol yet?
All that air resistance at speed yet they still haven't turned it into any form of power. Hows about mini ramjets hehe!
Cuprabob
Posts: 5027
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:31 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Panoramic Roof, 19" Black Luganos, Vienna Leather, Parking Sensors, DAB, Dynaudio, Bluetooth, Cruise, Folding Mirrors, Xenons
Location: S/W Scotland

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by Cuprabob »

Macman wrote:It goes towards the way that TSI engines generally prefer higher revs and the old saying from driving school that a car is to be accelerating or breaking and not coasting as the engine would be asking for power to be on/off and not efficient. Also why chip tuning makes it faster yet more efficient. I want this button on the steering wheel!
Can they get GEET to get as much power as petrol yet?
All that air resistance at speed yet they still haven't turned it into any form of power. Hows about mini ramjets hehe!
Whatever you've been taking, I would suggest you've had enough:-)
User avatar
whiteDevil_170
Posts: 2753
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:39 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box
Options: 19 inch lugano alloys , Metal pedals, satnav , DAB , leather , parking sensors , Red footwell LEDs , white led interior , hkb door sills , Needle sweep ,Horn beep on open/close , big speedo, drl deactivated, cornering fogs, An ocd for keeping it clean! Gloss black mirrors.
revo stage 1 remap
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by whiteDevil_170 »

:iagree: Haha brilliant
Jack

;) Lets Roc ;)
Macman
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:11 am
I drive a: Scirocco R
In: Rising Blue
With a: DSG box

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by Macman »

I got bored of Sky TV :)

The sad truth of more efficiency...See this inventor's full summary of his Electric Solar Thermal Ramjet. More efficient the faster it goes yet the industry won't build it as its cheap and no patent will protect it.
[youtube][/youtube]

Here's a DC2000 HHO kit on a Tiguan 170 TSI. " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Info: http://www.hho2.org/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by Macman on Tue May 14, 2013 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
dimexi
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:41 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Deep Black
With a: Manual box
Options: Parking Sensors

VAGCOM Mods:
DRL/PRL off
Needle sweep
XDS on
Big mph speedo
Alarm beep
Comfort indicator blinks adjusted to 4
Windows close via rain sensor

Other Mods:
Metal Pedals
Self installed VW OEM Bluetooth 7P6(L)
Self installed Cruise Control
RNS510
Stage 1 Bluefin

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by dimexi »

I don't think the argument of softer tyres and softer/stiffer suspension go hand in hand. One is to do with rolling friction resistance and the other is just dynamics and damping of the car's movements. I don't see the relationship straight off, might be an anomaly perhaps?
maisbitt
Posts: 1062
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:42 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Parking Sensors, Smokers Pack (for aesthetics), R gearstick, R pedals, Sliding cup holder cover.

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by maisbitt »

I have long thought that my Roc is more efficient with Sport on than either comfort or normal. I used to tinker with it for a while in early ownership - I always seemed to get about 2mpg more for the same journey and same conditions on my commute to work.

Maybe the ACC is working hard in normal, putting a bit of strain on the alternator, and the steering is getting less assistance in Sport as well as the stiffened suspension is helping aid more efficient transfer of kinetic energy to the road? Perhaps the "wallowing" of the car on softer suspension affects the aerodynamics in a negative way. It is probably a combination of all of this.

It could be the fact that I tend not to use Sport in the worst of winter when there are potholes about, or that you switch to comfort when you are faced with a poor road surface, and that poor road surface is going to affect your efficiencies.
2013 - Tornado Red MK7 Golf GTD on order
2011-2013 - Rising Blue 170GT
2009-2011 - Pewter Roc 140GT
2007-2009 - Tornado Red Golf 170TDI GT
2005-2007 - Black Pearl Golf 140TDI GT
2003-2005 - Black Pearl Polo 1.9TDI
User avatar
whiteDevil_170
Posts: 2753
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:39 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box
Options: 19 inch lugano alloys , Metal pedals, satnav , DAB , leather , parking sensors , Red footwell LEDs , white led interior , hkb door sills , Needle sweep ,Horn beep on open/close , big speedo, drl deactivated, cornering fogs, An ocd for keeping it clean! Gloss black mirrors.
revo stage 1 remap
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by whiteDevil_170 »

maisbitt wrote:I have long thought that my Roc is more efficient with Sport on than either comfort or normal. I used to tinker with it for a while in early ownership - I always seemed to get about 2mpg more for the same journey and same conditions on my commute to work.

Maybe the ACC is working hard in normal, putting a bit of strain on the alternator, and the steering is getting less assistance in Sport as well as the stiffened suspension is helping aid more efficient transfer of kinetic energy to the road? Perhaps the "wallowing" of the car on softer suspension affects the aerodynamics in a negative way. It is probably a combination of all of this.

It could be the fact that I tend not to use Sport in the worst of winter when there are potholes about, or that you switch to comfort when you are faced with a poor road surface, and that poor road surface is going to affect your efficiencies.
where I live all the roads are poor and coverd in potholes so I have it in comfort.... If only rw1 was here he could of put us straight! :(
Jack

;) Lets Roc ;)
Macman
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:11 am
I drive a: Scirocco R
In: Rising Blue
With a: DSG box

Re: ACC: Is 'Sport' more economical?

Post by Macman »

(If only, RIP Chris) This is what I wondered too about the acceleration on corners if its faster due to the XDS acting only on one wheel so not using it for anti-torque steer breaking. It would pull 90degrees to the axis (to the left) and so add more breaking to the right wheel on a straight road. If you are turning left it will not need to. If I felt it as you guys notice the change then it surely is there!
The XDS anti-torque steer is for a "refined fury" as they advertise. This car would be faster without it yet (you got it) a crazy car like the others.
Post Reply