Either way the 1.4 is no slouch. Taking off up the motorway slip road it easily leaves other cars as a dot in the rear view mirror
![Thumbs Up :yes:](./images/smilies/thumbsup3d.gif)
Its called being realistic mate. Why did u go for a 2.0T Scirocco, was it because "you couldnt afford" a 911 GT3.....Andy-GTI wrote:Buying a 1.4 just says you couldn't afford the 2.0 tbh
Good idea, I guess you may need the extra money if the engine lets go and VW won't pay out under warranty on a modified car!Deacon wrote:There is a simple solution to all this - buy the 1.4 and have it REVO'd = more power than the 2.0 and about £3k left in the bank. Simples.![]()
Deacon
samwell wrote:Good idea, I guess you may need the extra money if the engine lets go and VW won't pay out under warranty on a modified car!Deacon wrote:There is a simple solution to all this - buy the 1.4 and have it REVO'd = more power than the 2.0 and about £3k left in the bank. Simples.![]()
Deacon![]()
Get the 2.0 if you think you will be able to use its full potential. As has been said if you won't get out of town much the 1.4 will most probably be more than enough.
Get the 2.0 revo'd though and its a different ball game...!
LOL, I was just saying that this could happen mate. Have many Revo'd 1.4s covered lots of miles to assess its longevity? As we both said it completely depends on how the car is going to be used and whether the extra outlay will be worth it.Deacon wrote:samwell wrote:Good idea, I guess you may need the extra money if the engine lets go and VW won't pay out under warranty on a modified car!Deacon wrote:There is a simple solution to all this - buy the 1.4 and have it REVO'd = more power than the 2.0 and about £3k left in the bank. Simples.![]()
Deacon![]()
Get the 2.0 if you think you will be able to use its full potential. As has been said if you won't get out of town much the 1.4 will most probably be more than enough.
Get the 2.0 revo'd though and its a different ball game...!
Yep, 'cos it's well documented that remapped 1.4's engines regularly let go.... Oh no, sorry that complete rubbish![]()
Obviously if someone is after ultimate performance then the 2.0 and remap is the way to go. However if you want better performance than a stock 2.0 and a considerable chunk of change then the 1.4 with a remap is a good option.
Deacon
Very well said. I totally agree with your sentiment.SciroccoSteve wrote:Its called being realistic mate. Why did u go for a 2.0T Scirocco, was it because "you couldnt afford" a 911 GT3.....Andy-GTI wrote:Buying a 1.4 just says you couldn't afford the 2.0 tbh
Plenty of Golfs with the same engine have run for years with no problems. REVO themselves I understand had a 1.4Tsi Golf which was treated to plenty of 'spirited' miles and had no problems what so ever and is now running very nicely for it's current owner who is the husband of someone who works for REVO. Companies like REVO, APR, Superchips,etc would'nt be releasing remaps for the 1.4 if they soon after grenaded the engine.samwell wrote:LOL, I was just saying that this could happen mate. Have many Revo'd 1.4s covered lots of miles to assess its longevity? As we both said it completely depends on how the car is going to be used and whether the extra outlay will be worth it.
IF, and I know it is a big if as VW are oh so reliable (or so we all think), something does go wrong, a warranty would be worth its weight in gold.
Ah good, some great information there Deacon and glad to hear VW aren't too bothered about aftermarket modifications. However, technically, putting back to stock and claiming under warranty would be a form of fraud if something were to go wrong. I know your experience is a positive one but I have heard so many horror stories or warranties being void with other marques I am always quite sceptical. For example, someone on another forum with a Corsa VXR had the dreaded piston 4 issue which according to Vauxhall required a whole new engine (approx £6000) but warranty was refused for a couple of reasons: 1) aftermarket brakes were fitted 2) it was dropped off at the dealers on a trailer that had some motorsport wheels on it (for a completely different vehicle) and 3) they had "proof" it had been used on track days. All of which meant the owner was faced with a huge bill!Deacon wrote:Plenty of Golfs with the same engine have run for years with no problems. REVO themselves I understand had a 1.4Tsi Golf which was treated to plenty of 'spirited' miles and had no problems what so ever and is now running very nicely for it's current owner who is the husband of someone who works for REVO. Companies like REVO, APR, Superchips,etc would'nt be releasing remaps for the 1.4 if they soon after grenaded the engine.samwell wrote:LOL, I was just saying that this could happen mate. Have many Revo'd 1.4s covered lots of miles to assess its longevity? As we both said it completely depends on how the car is going to be used and whether the extra outlay will be worth it.
IF, and I know it is a big if as VW are oh so reliable (or so we all think), something does go wrong, a warranty would be worth its weight in gold.
Since I've had my 'roc REVO'd I have had warrenty work carried out with no problems what so ever. Even if the engine were to develop probelms when turned back to the stock setting VW would have to be pretty seriously suspicious to investigate the ECU enough to find the map and as I understand it that is quite a big job and not something that would be undertaken unless they felt it absolutely necessary. When having my car mapped I did ask at REVO about dealers detecting the map and was told that normal dealers do not have the necessary equipment to detect the car has been remapped.
Deacon
samwell wrote:Ah good, some great information there Deacon and glad to hear VW aren't too bothered about aftermarket modifications. However, technically, putting back to stock and claiming under warranty would be a form of fraud if something were to go wrong. I know your experience is a positive one but I have heard so many horror stories or warranties being void with other marques I am always quite sceptical. For example, someone on another forum with a Corsa VXR had the dreaded piston 4 issue which according to Vauxhall required a whole new engine (approx £6000) but warranty was refused for a couple of reasons: 1) aftermarket brakes were fitted 2) it was dropped off at the dealers on a trailer that had some motorsport wheels on it (for a completely different vehicle) and 3) they had "proof" it had been used on track days. All of which meant the owner was faced with a huge bill!
Anyways, if none of this bothers you go for the 2.0
TimM696 wrote:Install an Abt remap and keep your factory warranty
should equal a 2.0 in power and torque (if not better than the 2.0!)
The only downside is the price of the Abt remap but it's still £1500 less than the 2.0( In Belgium)
You've hit the nail on the head there. Its a question of choosing the car that meets your desires / requirements a closely as possbile and yet is still affordable for you.rhcp128 wrote: p.s. there is always something more expensive and betterdoesn't mean you can't get something that costs less and still makes you happy
so does buying a scirocco just say you cant afford a TT?Andy-GTI wrote:Buying a 1.4 just says you couldn't afford the 2.0 tbh
Touché!pishpashposh wrote:so does buying a scirocco just say you cant afford a TT?Andy-GTI wrote:Buying a 1.4 just says you couldn't afford the 2.0 tbh
I see what you're saying maisbitt, although I looked at the extras that you get on the GT trim & felt I really didn't need them, niceities but not necessities, as well as the 1.4 giving enough power when I consider my day to day driving routemaisbitt wrote:I would think that the most offputting aspect of the 1.4 is that it doesn't come in GT trim. Most buyers want the GT stuff, but for some reason, VW want you to spend £1500 to spec the GT stuff that you can get on a TDI for only £1100 more (GT vs Standard TDI140). What is the point of VW not putting out a GT trim 1.4 when there's nothing in the GT trim that is unique and cannot be specced on a non GT car?