What engine would you have?
- whiteDevil_170
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:39 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Candy White
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: What engine would you have?
Yes it's mainly short. As I work all week and hardly have spare time to go anywhere. And i only live 5 miles away from work. Just I fancy a diesel for the torque and resell vaules would be good wouldn't it? And dad thinks diesels are better
Jack
Lets Roc
Lets Roc
Re: What engine would you have?
If you are very low mileage don't even think about it - go for petrol! There won't be much difference in re-sale values after say 3 years.
Re: What engine would you have?
As said above, get a petrol, your'e not doing enough miles to keep a DPF clean.
-
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 10:42 am
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Indium Grey
- With a: DSG box
Re: What engine would you have?
Unless your prepared to do a good hour's 50 mph+ driving on the weekend a diesel engine will suffer from short trips with the DPF becoming problematic.yaroc wrote:As said above, get a petrol, your'e not doing enough miles to keep a DPF clean.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:34 am
- I drive a: 2.0 TDI 140
- In: Rising Blue
- With a: DSG box
Re: What engine would you have?
Have driven a 140 tdi for just under 3 years and done 50k miles and it has excelled but if it's fun you're looking for then, in my opinion, petrol is the one for me!
M@
M@
-
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:11 pm
- I drive a: Scirocco R
- In: Candy White
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Brampton
- Contact:
Re: What engine would you have?
if you have the Money get an R
- whiteDevil_170
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:39 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Candy White
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: What engine would you have?
That's the thing I don't . If I had the money I wouldn't be asking what engine to get , I'd get a R hands down
Jack
Lets Roc
Lets Roc
-
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:11 pm
- I drive a: Scirocco R
- In: Candy White
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Brampton
- Contact:
Re: What engine would you have?
i dont do too many miles so i can run the R but if i was doing a high mileage i would go for one of the Diesels
- whiteDevil_170
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:39 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Candy White
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: What engine would you have?
I don't do high miles either, but still can't afford R in 1st place.
Jack
Lets Roc
Lets Roc
Re: What engine would you have?
you clearly say you don't do many miles at all & that you are young so insurance is clearly a factor. if you are not going to do long motorway runs on a reasonably regular basis to ensure the dpf stays clear that leaves you with the option of: petrol (& as stated not an R due to costs).
also do you mean 2nd hand?
also do you mean 2nd hand?
Drive_with_Style wrote:Not in situation I can buy one right now but I'll be buying a 2nd roc soon
- whiteDevil_170
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:39 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Candy White
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: What engine would you have?
Yes I meant 2nd hand . Petrol it's going to be then I guess. My knowledge on engines etc isn't great so don't surpose you could explain what Dpf is? Also hi trix
Jack
Lets Roc
Lets Roc
Re: What engine would you have?
the dpf is the diesel particulate filter which removes the soot particles from the exhaust gases http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_particulate_filter" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- whiteDevil_170
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:39 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Candy White
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: What engine would you have?
Thanks for clearing that up. Could of just googled it my self, Ah well
Jack
Lets Roc
Lets Roc
Re: What engine would you have?
One of my friends has a 1.6TDI (105PS?) Ibiza and that has the DPF - her journey to work is probably less than 5 miles each way and whilst she says she wouldn't buy another diesel with a DPF, all it needs is a clear out every so often - when the light comes on which for her is about weekly. It's only if you don't then give the car a run to clear the DPF and let it build up that it would become an issue.
I remember the days when we had an easy choice to make - the 140 (believe it was still PD at the time) engine didn't have a DPF, the 170 did. 140 it was then.
I remember the days when we had an easy choice to make - the 140 (believe it was still PD at the time) engine didn't have a DPF, the 170 did. 140 it was then.
- whiteDevil_170
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:39 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Candy White
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: What engine would you have?
My journey is 5 miles each way so 10 miles daily. Now and again ill have chance to go on a 30-40 mile little trip.Heck I don't know what I'm going to get, all I know is that it's definitely a scirocco I want.
Jack
Lets Roc
Lets Roc
-
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:42 am
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Rising Blue
- With a: Manual box
Re: What engine would you have?
Very short commutes (less than 5 miles each way) on slow roads are inviting DPF trouble with a TDI so make sure it gets a run on the motorway for 10 mins a few times a week to burn off the collected soot. Between the TDIs the 170 is worth every penny of the £765 premium over a 140TDI GT (it's a bit more of a gap if you weren't intending getting a GT). If you're doing low mileages then a TDI doesn't make sense over a petrol variant unless you prefer the driving style of a diesel ( I personally prefer having loads of torque for overtaking rather than having slightly better acceleration from a static start, and quieter at cruising speed because it's only doing 2000rpm at 75mph).
170 vs 140: Far better power delivery in the upper gears, massively better engine note. I've had both variants as I bought my first Roc before the 170TDI was out. The 140 is good if you're a diesel driver who hasn't driven the 170 yet, but once you've driven one you won't want to settle for the 140 unless there are insurance/money/company car (you lucky sods!) restraints. Economy wise I average about 49mpg (indicated - about 45mpg in reality) compared with about 52mpg in the 140 when I had it. Although my best ever economy for a long trip was 59mpg for a 350 mile journey maintaining 75mpg, with the aircon on (in the 140).
You might be in for a shock when you first get your 170 though. For the first few hundred miles it didn't feel much more powerful than a 140 - these are really tight from the factory, almost as if there is some software retardation going on while it's running in. After 300 miles it was like a different car, and has a very deep roar about it when you accelerate (the 140 doesn't sound like this, not sure why).
170 vs 140: Far better power delivery in the upper gears, massively better engine note. I've had both variants as I bought my first Roc before the 170TDI was out. The 140 is good if you're a diesel driver who hasn't driven the 170 yet, but once you've driven one you won't want to settle for the 140 unless there are insurance/money/company car (you lucky sods!) restraints. Economy wise I average about 49mpg (indicated - about 45mpg in reality) compared with about 52mpg in the 140 when I had it. Although my best ever economy for a long trip was 59mpg for a 350 mile journey maintaining 75mpg, with the aircon on (in the 140).
You might be in for a shock when you first get your 170 though. For the first few hundred miles it didn't feel much more powerful than a 140 - these are really tight from the factory, almost as if there is some software retardation going on while it's running in. After 300 miles it was like a different car, and has a very deep roar about it when you accelerate (the 140 doesn't sound like this, not sure why).
2013 - Tornado Red MK7 Golf GTD on order
2011-2013 - Rising Blue 170GT
2009-2011 - Pewter Roc 140GT
2007-2009 - Tornado Red Golf 170TDI GT
2005-2007 - Black Pearl Golf 140TDI GT
2003-2005 - Black Pearl Polo 1.9TDI
2011-2013 - Rising Blue 170GT
2009-2011 - Pewter Roc 140GT
2007-2009 - Tornado Red Golf 170TDI GT
2005-2007 - Black Pearl Golf 140TDI GT
2003-2005 - Black Pearl Polo 1.9TDI
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:49 pm
- I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
- In: Candy White
- With a: Manual box
Re: What engine would you have?
I am biased I guess, but I did drive the 140, 170 and the petrol 160 before choosing my Roc
I do around 12000 miles per annum, and wanted a car for short journeys with a couple of runs every week. My previous car was a Civic Tyrpe R GT.
The 160 just felt like a better deal on price overall as it was a non GT, but I find it great for my use and well equipped. A small extra but the multi function steering wheel makes the interior feel very different to standard imo. Performance wise I found them all good tbh, but did not justify the 170 on cost difference for what i wanted.
Sorry I am not a techi but am just offering my experience when I chose my car, hope this helps.
I do around 12000 miles per annum, and wanted a car for short journeys with a couple of runs every week. My previous car was a Civic Tyrpe R GT.
The 160 just felt like a better deal on price overall as it was a non GT, but I find it great for my use and well equipped. A small extra but the multi function steering wheel makes the interior feel very different to standard imo. Performance wise I found them all good tbh, but did not justify the 170 on cost difference for what i wanted.
Sorry I am not a techi but am just offering my experience when I chose my car, hope this helps.
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:33 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Salsa Red
- With a: DSG box
Re: What engine would you have?
Maybe I am wrong but I am pretty sure the diesels are holding their value a little better than the petrols right now so you will get more for your money if you go petrol.
You will probably loose out a bit when it comes to resale too but depreciation is going to hurt either way!
My choice for low miles and low cost would be the petrol.
You will probably loose out a bit when it comes to resale too but depreciation is going to hurt either way!
My choice for low miles and low cost would be the petrol.
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:28 am
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Indium Grey
- With a: Manual box
Re: What engine would you have?
I have definitely noticed an increase in performance of my 170TDI over the last few hundred miles. I have now reached just over 800 miles and the car feels so much more powerful then it did when I first had it.maisbitt wrote: You might be in for a shock when you first get your 170 though. For the first few hundred miles it didn't feel much more powerful than a 140 - these are really tight from the factory, almost as if there is some software retardation going on while it's running in. After 300 miles it was like a different car, and has a very deep roar about it when you accelerate (the 140 doesn't sound like this, not sure why).
- whiteDevil_170
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:39 pm
- I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 170/184
- In: Candy White
- With a: Manual box
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: What engine would you have?
Friend from work has got a golf 2.0 gt tdi 170 Dpf. Now I asked him if he has had any trouble with the Dpf. He said no and he drives about 2 mile to work each way. And like me goes on 30 mile plus trips now and again.
Jack
Lets Roc
Lets Roc