1.4 160PS vs 2.0 210PS

Talk about general things related to the new VW Scirocco in here.
tartangti
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:49 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Anthracite Vienna Leather, Rear Parking Sensors, Electric Folding Mirrors, Flat Tyre Indicator, Smokers Pack!

Re: 1.4 160PS vs 2.0 210PS

Post by tartangti »

Had a mk5 Golf GTI so would have felt like the car would be a drop in performance from what I was used to if I went for the 160bhp 1.4. That and, as others have said, all the extra options on the GT pack (18s,Climate control,fogs, tints) are boxes that I would have ticked so given that it wasn't much more expensive for the 2.0 over the 1.4. I only do 5k miles a years and im over 30 so insurance/economy wasn't a big factor for me either though I guess depending on your circumstances the extra 5 mpg and being several insurance groups higher could easily be a deal breaker.
User avatar
andres
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:44 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TDI 140/150
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box
Options: DCC, brown leather..

Re: 1.4 160PS vs 2.0 210PS

Post by andres »

1.4 is ok, until you have driven the 2.0 ;)
ZephyR
Posts: 914
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:59 pm
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box
Options: 18" Inters, Front fogs, Multi-function steering wheel, Parking sensors & Interior mats
Location: Manchester

Re: 1.4 160PS vs 2.0 210PS

Post by ZephyR »

andres wrote:1.4 is ok, until you have driven the 2.0 ;)
2.0 is OK until you have driven the R.
R is OK until you have driven a M3.
M3 is OK until you have driven a Lamo.

Errrr .... where does this stop ?
rhcp128
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:10 am
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Sumatra
With a: Manual box

Re: 1.4 160PS vs 2.0 210PS

Post by rhcp128 »

Well, I suppose nothing quite like launching in space shuttle :P
Tallguy
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:18 pm
Location: Surrey

Re: 1.4 160PS vs 2.0 210PS

Post by Tallguy »

The bottom line to this post surely is that the various Scirocco models (petrol + diesel) are all good and you choose the one that best meets your needs/pocket.
I have to say one or two 2.0 litre GT owners have displayed a bit of arrogance in their comments but as others have mentioned if you were really loaded you would not buy a mass produced car!
The Darkness
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:10 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Sumatra
With a: Manual box
Options: Parking sensor, folding mirrors, cruise and flat indicator.

Re: 1.4 160PS vs 2.0 210PS

Post by The Darkness »

I honestly think I'd have been happy with either, but I fancied the GT spec and after that there wasnt a lot in it price wise between the 1.4 and the 2L. Was wary about the economy but its been amazing; better than the 1.8 diesel mondeo it replaced. I guess petrol engines have come a long way in 7 years.....
Post Reply