Looks or performance ?

Talk about general things related to the new VW Scirocco in here.
Post Reply

Well ?

Looks
81
77%
Performance
24
23%
 
Total votes: 105

shooms
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:06 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Pano sunroof, Dynaudio, premium sills, metal pedals & alu gear-knob.
Location: Portsmouth

Looks or performance ?

Post by shooms »

OK... we all know we've got one of the best looking cars on the road & it's got performance to match (speaking for the 2.0 TSI boys anyhoos ;)) but what sold you initially... be honest ;)

Hands up for me... I was as shallow as they come... I saw it last September when VAG had a fleet car showday at work & fell head over heels in lust with the looks of it.... & thank the lord it had the grunt & the handling to match :D

How about you ? Are you as shallow as me or to give a classic metaphor would you do a minger so long as she went like the clappers ? :D
sir_rocco
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 11:49 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Reflex Silver
With a: DSG box
Location: West Oxfordshire

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by sir_rocco »

Shooms,

came from a modded GTi running 255-260 BHP so was a tad disappointed to see the roc launch with "only" 200 BHP, I feel they should of gone with a K04 equipped engine from the off. As I have mentioned on other threads, having driven APS's highly modded edition 30 running 330BHP even my Milltek equipped remapped rocco does not feel too fast. I do also find it a tad awkward from certain angles, beautiful from others.

The thing that sold it to me was the heritage of the original MK1 roc and the fact that it was a completely fresh look for VW. Its not completely new look though, you do see similarities with the older model civic hatch (flame me on that if you like) and also the C30 Volvo.

Still loving it though for now, until I take the plunge on a K04 upgrade that is :clap:
Taken delivery : Silver, DSG, NAV, Black Leather, Park Sensors, Winter pack.

Mods: Full Milltek, KW lowering springs,Wheel Spacers, Remapped to 258BHP, 405Nm
User avatar
CTRnutter
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:08 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Reflex Silver
With a: DSG box
Options: Winter Pack, Leather, Alu Pedals, GT Steering Wheel Badge, Side Sills, Superchips Re-Map, Milltek Non-Res, K&N Induction Kit
Location: Chigwell, Essex

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by CTRnutter »

shooms wrote: How about you ? Are you as shallow as me or to give a classic metaphor would you do a minger so long as she went like the clappers ? :D

That sentence just made my day ha ha :D

I bought mine because of how it looked to be honest as, its not the fastest car you can buy for the money but its more about the complete package :)
Car is now Sold!!!!! BMW 7 Series for now as nice and big but holding out for something a little special as my toy :)
wigit
Posts: 6560
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:46 pm
Options: I used to own one
Location: Northamptonshire

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by wigit »

i went for perfomance given the rave reviews in the handling department, ride height and lack of grunt (compared to K04 power) did niggle but both resolved now, car does looks stunning from some angles but certain views of the rear makes it look a bit awkard, its a car that does have knickers as well as a fur coat :rolleyes:
Golf 7R - Golf 7R - BMW M2
User avatar
Evil Derboy
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:18 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Deep Black
With a: Manual box
Options: Leather • Nav
Contact:

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by Evil Derboy »

.
Last edited by Evil Derboy on Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
morrissey
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:23 pm
In: Deep Black
With a: Manual box
Options: Golf R, 3 door, manual, leather, sunroof, 19" alloys, ACC, cruise, comfort and storage packs
Location: Warks

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by morrissey »

Looks were the clincher, but 200 BHP was the entry requirement :D
User avatar
AL1874
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:34 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Folding mirrors, Reversing sensors, Continental headlamps, Insect collection evenly distributed over front end.
Location: Mönchengladbach

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by AL1874 »

The performance did leave me a little cold when I got to finally drive it and will be adding bluefin to hopefully rectify this at the earliest opportunity.

It was the looks that swung it for myself and it does look great.
TÜV Approved, Nürburgring Tested.
ryancooke
Posts: 662
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:23 am
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Candy White
With a: Manual box
Options: xenons, folding mirrors, dynamic audio, floor mats (free) autoglym (free)

now modified with dump valve, boost gauge in custom made vent, "gt" steering wheel badge, carbon fibre badges, rs4 wheels, lowered 35mm, private plate S18OCO, custom de-cat and cat back exhaust with quad tips, air filter behind fog lamp heat wrapped, customised front bumper grills painted gloss black, customised rear bumper smoothed and lower spoiler painted gloss black, mouldings and mirrors sprayed in gloss black, gloss black roof and rear spoiler, colour coded dash trims, door trims, centre console trims and rear seat trims, led fog light bulbs, s3 intercooler, audi a4 "S line" gear knob, newspeed hi-flow throttle body pipe, newspeed hi-flow turbo pipe, uprated dog mount bush, front to back and side to side quickshift, 20mm front spacers
Location: crewe

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by ryancooke »

i cant really cast a vote on this one, as i bought it for the looks but they needed improving (in my eyes), but also because of the tuning (improvement needed again lol) that is available for it, as the standard 200bhp is ok i suppose but its so easy to get close to the 300bhp mark with the standard turbo.
MY CARS IS SOLD 21.5K BETTER OFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jimmyb
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:56 pm
In: Sumatra
With a: Manual box
Options: Enough...

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by Jimmyb »

Looks...as I generally don't care much about performance...I mean a stop-signal is still a stop signal, no matter how fast your car can pull...you are bound to get the other soon. Same as driving on the highway...maximum speed is maximum speed, no matter how fast you care pulls up to 100km/h in those few less/extra seconds...but that's me...looks like Im the only one with a 1.4 TSI...

Looks, (high-)tech, performance...
DjIceT
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 6:56 am
I drive a: 1.4 TSI 160
In: Pewter Grey
With a: Manual box
Options: Alarm, parking sensor, cruise control, coming/leaving home lights, rain sensor, GT package, 18" Chicago alloys, multifunction steering wheel, alloy pedals.
RNS 510 - installed, not working yet..
Location: Stavanger, Norway

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by DjIceT »

Jimmyb wrote:looks like Im the only one with a 1.4 TSI...
You're not the only one. I also got a 1.4 TSI. But I live in Norway and here the 2.0 is ridiculously exspensive (starting at about £41,000 :fall: ). My roc is "only" £35,000 with some extras..
I saw the Scirocco for the first time a early morning, half asleep on the bus to work, in october last year. Never woken up that fast before!!! It was love at first sight!! So definitively looks that did it for me. And now I own that exact car! :D :D (It was a demo car at the local VW dealership).
Jimmyb
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:56 pm
In: Sumatra
With a: Manual box
Options: Enough...

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by Jimmyb »

DjIceT wrote:
Jimmyb wrote:looks like Im the only one with a 1.4 TSI...
You're not the only one. I also got a 1.4 TSI. But I live in Norway and here the 2.0 is ridiculously exspensive (starting at about £41,000 :fall: ). My roc is "only" £35,000 with some extras..
I saw the Scirocco for the first time a early morning, half asleep on the bus to work, in october last year. Never woken up that fast before!!! It was love at first sight!! So definitively looks that did it for me. And now I own that exact car! :D :D (It was a demo car at the local VW dealership).
O...wow...I had to pay 6000 euro more for 1.4 to 2.5 few seconds extra....no thank you...I rather save some pocket money, at 1) ordering and 2) Gas on the longer run, to invest it and get some more money to finally buy my mercedes... :p
User avatar
AL1874
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:34 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Folding mirrors, Reversing sensors, Continental headlamps, Insect collection evenly distributed over front end.
Location: Mönchengladbach

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by AL1874 »

[quote="Jimmyb"]Looks...Same as driving on the highway...maximum speed is maximum speed, u]looks[/u] quote]

What's a maximum speed on the highway :D
TÜV Approved, Nürburgring Tested.
Jimmyb
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:56 pm
In: Sumatra
With a: Manual box
Options: Enough...

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by Jimmyb »

AL1874 wrote:
Jimmyb wrote:Looks...Same as driving on the highway...maximum speed is maximum speed, u]looks[/u] quote]

What's a maximum speed on the highway :D
Here only 100 to 120 KM/H...at some pieces only 80 KM/H...Admitted I drive 20 KM/H more....
User avatar
AL1874
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:34 pm
I drive a: GT 2.0 TSI
In: Rising Blue
With a: Manual box
Options: Folding mirrors, Reversing sensors, Continental headlamps, Insect collection evenly distributed over front end.
Location: Mönchengladbach

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by AL1874 »

Out here it is as fast as you car will go, so about 148 mph

But obviously it's only when road and weather conditions allow.
TÜV Approved, Nürburgring Tested.
Jimmyb
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:56 pm
In: Sumatra
With a: Manual box
Options: Enough...

Re: Looks or performance ?

Post by Jimmyb »

AL1874 wrote:Out here it is as fast as you car will go, so about 148 mph

But obviously it's only when road and weather conditions allow.
Yeah...you know how the dutch are... :nod:
Post Reply